Twitter Facebook Flickr YouTube RSS

President Obama’s Address on Iraq and the End of Operation Iraqi Freedom (Video)

September 1, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

President Obama

Last night, President Obama addressed the American people about the end of Operation Iraqi Freedom, our military’s exit from Iraq and what influence American military will have over the government and people of Iraq and Afghanistan.

“So tonight I am announcing that the American combat mission in Iraq has ended. Operation Iraqi Freedom is over and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country. This was my pledge to the American people as a candidate for this office.”

Watch President Obama’s full address below. For those who cannot watch the video, a full transcript is below.

Transcript:

Good evening. Tonight, I’d like to talk to you about the end of our combat mission in Iraq, the ongoing security challenges we face, and the need to rebuild our nation here at home.

I know this historic moment comes at a time of great uncertainty for many Americans. We’ve now been through nearly a decade of war. We’ve endured a long and painful recession. And sometimes in the midst of these storms, the future that we’re trying to build for our nation — a future of lasting peace and long-term prosperity — may seem beyond our reach.

But this milestone should serve as a reminder to all Americans that the future is ours to shape if we move forward with confidence and commitment. It should also serve as a message to the world that the United States of America intends to sustain and strengthen our leadership in this young century.

From this desk, seven and a half years ago, President Bush announced the beginning of military operations in Iraq. Much has changed since that night. A war to disarm a state became a fight against an insurgency. Terrorism and sectarian warfare threatened to tear Iraq apart. Thousands of Americans gave their lives; tens of thousands have been wounded. Our relations abroad were strained. Our unity at home was tested.

These are the rough waters encountered during the course of one of America’s longest wars. Yet there has been one constant amidst these shifting tides. At every turn, America’s men and women in uniform have served with courage and resolve. As Commander-in-Chief, I am incredibly proud of their service. And like all Americans, I’m awed by their sacrifice, and by the sacrifices of their families.

The Americans who have served in Iraq completed every mission they were given. They defeated a regime that had terrorized its people. Together with Iraqis and coalition partners who made huge sacrifices of their own, our troops fought block by block to help Iraq seize the chance for a better future. They shifted tactics to protect the Iraqi people, trained Iraqi Security Forces, and took out terrorist leaders. Because of our troops and civilians — and because of the resilience of the Iraqi people — Iraq has the opportunity to embrace a new destiny, even though many challenges remain.

So tonight, I am announcing that the American combat mission in Iraq has ended. Operation Iraqi Freedom is over, and the Iraqi people now have lead responsibility for the security of their country.

This was my pledge to the American people as a candidate for this office. Last February, I announced a plan that would bring our combat brigades out of Iraq, while redoubling our efforts to strengthen Iraq’s Security Forces and support its government and people.

That’s what we’ve done. We’ve removed nearly 100,000 U.S. troops from Iraq. We’ve closed or transferred to the Iraqis hundreds of bases. And we have moved millions of pieces of equipment out of Iraq.

This completes a transition to Iraqi responsibility for their own security. U.S. troops pulled out of Iraq’s cities last summer, and Iraqi forces have moved into the lead with considerable skill and commitment to their fellow citizens. Even as Iraq continues to suffer terrorist attacks, security incidents have been near the lowest on record since the war began. And Iraqi forces have taken the fight to al Qaeda, removing much of its leadership in Iraqi-led operations.

This year also saw Iraq hold credible elections that drew a strong turnout. A caretaker administration is in place as Iraqis form a government based on the results of that election. Tonight, I encourage Iraq’s leaders to move forward with a sense of urgency to form an inclusive government that is just, representative, and accountable to the Iraqi people. And when that government is in place, there should be no doubt: The Iraqi people will have a strong partner in the United States. Our combat mission is ending, but our commitment to Iraq’s future is not.

Going forward, a transitional force of U.S. troops will remain in Iraq with a different mission: advising and assisting Iraq’s Security Forces, supporting Iraqi troops in targeted counter-terrorism missions, and protecting our civilians. Consistent with our agreement with the Iraqi government, all U.S. troops will leave by the end of next year. As our military draws down, our dedicated civilians — diplomats, aid workers, and advisers — are moving into the lead to support Iraq as it strengthens its government, resolves political disputes, resettles those displaced by war, and builds ties with the region and the world. That’s a message that Vice President Biden is delivering to the Iraqi people through his visit there today.

This new approach reflects our long-term partnership with Iraq — one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect. Of course, violence will not end with our combat mission. Extremists will continue to set off bombs, attack Iraqi civilians and try to spark sectarian strife. But ultimately, these terrorists will fail to achieve their goals. Iraqis are a proud people. They have rejected sectarian war, and they have no interest in endless destruction. They understand that, in the end, only Iraqis can resolve their differences and police their streets. Only Iraqis can build a democracy within their borders. What America can do, and will do, is provide support for the Iraqi people as both a friend and a partner.

Ending this war is not only in Iraq’s interest — it’s in our own. The United States has paid a huge price to put the future of Iraq in the hands of its people. We have sent our young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq, and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home. We’ve persevered because of a belief we share with the Iraqi people — a belief that out of the ashes of war, a new beginning could be born in this cradle of civilization. Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the United States and Iraq, we have met our responsibility. Now, it’s time to turn the page.

As we do, I’m mindful that the Iraq war has been a contentious issue at home. Here, too, it’s time to turn the page. This afternoon, I spoke to former President George W. Bush. It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset. Yet no one can doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security. As I’ve said, there were patriots who supported this war, and patriots who opposed it. And all of us are united in appreciation for our servicemen and women, and our hopes for Iraqis’ future.

The greatness of our democracy is grounded in our ability to move beyond our differences, and to learn from our experience as we confront the many challenges ahead. And no challenge is more essential to our security than our fight against al Qaeda.

Americans across the political spectrum supported the use of force against those who attacked us on 9/11. Now, as we approach our 10th year of combat in Afghanistan, there are those who are understandably asking tough questions about our mission there. But we must never lose sight of what’s at stake. As we speak, al Qaeda continues to plot against us, and its leadership remains anchored in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan. We will disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda, while preventing Afghanistan from again serving as a base for terrorists. And because of our draw down in Iraq, we are now able to apply the resources necessary to go on offense. In fact, over the last 19 months, nearly a dozen al Qaeda leaders — and hundreds of al Qaeda’s extremist allies — have been killed or captured around the world.

Within Afghanistan, I’ve ordered the deployment of additional troops who — under the command of General David Petraeus — are fighting to break the Taliban’s momentum.

As with the surge in Iraq, these forces will be in place for a limited time to provide space for the Afghans to build their capacity and secure their own future. But, as was the case in Iraq, we can’t do for Afghans what they must ultimately do for themselves. That’s why we’re training Afghan Security Forces and supporting a political resolution to Afghanistan’s problems. And next August, we will begin a transition to Afghan responsibility. The pace of our troop reductions will be determined by conditions on the ground, and our support for Afghanistan will endure. But make no mistake: This transition will begin — because open-ended war serves neither our interests nor the Afghan people’s.

Indeed, one of the lessons of our effort in Iraq is that American influence around the world is not a function of military force alone. We must use all elements of our power — including our diplomacy, our economic strength, and the power of America’s example — to secure our interests and stand by our allies. And we must project a vision of the future that’s based not just on our fears, but also on our hopes — a vision that recognizes the real dangers that exist around the world, but also the limitless possibilities of our time.

Today, old adversaries are at peace, and emerging democracies are potential partners. New markets for our goods stretch from Asia to the Americas. A new push for peace in the Middle East will begin here tomorrow. Billions of young people want to move beyond the shackles of poverty and conflict. As the leader of the free world, America will do more than just defeat on the battlefield those who offer hatred and destruction — we will also lead among those who are willing to work together to expand freedom and opportunity for all people.

Now, that effort must begin within our own borders. Throughout our history, America has been willing to bear the burden of promoting liberty and human dignity overseas, understanding its links to our own liberty and security. But we have also understood that our nation’s strength and influence abroad must be firmly anchored in our prosperity at home. And the bedrock of that prosperity must be a growing middle class.

Unfortunately, over the last decade, we’ve not done what’s necessary to shore up the foundations of our own prosperity. We spent a trillion dollars at war, often financed by borrowing from overseas. This, in turn, has short-changed investments in our own people, and contributed to record deficits. For too long, we have put off tough decisions on everything from our manufacturing base to our energy policy to education reform. As a result, too many middle-class families find themselves working harder for less, while our nation’s long-term competitiveness is put at risk.

And so at this moment, as we wind down the war in Iraq, we must tackle those challenges at home with as much energy, and grit, and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad. They have met every test that they faced. Now, it’s our turn. Now, it’s our responsibility to honor them by coming together, all of us, and working to secure the dream that so many generations have fought for — the dream that a better life awaits anyone who is willing to work for it and reach for it.

Our most urgent task is to restore our economy, and put the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs back to work. To strengthen our middle class, we must give all our children the education they deserve, and all our workers the skills that they need to compete in a global economy. We must jump start industries that create jobs, and end our dependence on foreign oil. We must unleash the innovation that allows new products to roll off our assembly lines, and nurture the ideas that spring from our entrepreneurs. This will be difficult. But in the days to come, it must be our central mission as a people, and my central responsibility as President.

Part of that responsibility is making sure that we honor our commitments to those who have served our country with such valor. As long as I am President, we will maintain the finest fighting force that the world has ever known, and we will do whatever it takes to serve our veterans as well as they have served us. This is a sacred trust. That’s why we’ve already made one of the largest increases in funding for veterans in decades. We’re treating the signature wounds of today’s wars — post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury — while providing the health care and benefits that all of our veterans have earned. And we’re funding a Post-9/11 GI Bill that helps our veterans and their families pursue the dream of a college education. Just as the GI Bill helped those who fought World War II — including my grandfather — become the backbone of our middle class, so today’s servicemen and women must have the chance to apply their gifts to expand the American economy. Because part of ending a war responsibly is standing by those who have fought it.

Two weeks ago, America’s final combat brigade in Iraq — the Army’s Fourth Stryker Brigade — journeyed home in the pre-dawn darkness. Thousands of soldiers and hundreds of vehicles made the trip from Baghdad, the last of them passing into Kuwait in the early morning hours. Over seven years before, American troops and coalition partners had fought their way across similar highways, but this time no shots were fired. It was just a convoy of brave Americans, making their way home.

Of course, the soldiers left much behind. Some were teenagers when the war began. Many have served multiple tours of duty, far from families who bore a heroic burden of their own, enduring the absence of a husband’s embrace or a mother’s kiss. Most painfully, since the war began, 55 members of the Fourth Stryker Brigade made the ultimate sacrifice — part of over 4,400 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq. As one staff sergeant said, “I know that to my brothers in arms who fought and died, this day would probably mean a lot.”

Those Americans gave their lives for the values that have lived in the hearts of our people for over two centuries. Along with nearly 1.5 million Americans who have served in Iraq, they fought in a faraway place for people they never knew. They stared into the darkest of human creations — war — and helped the Iraqi people seek the light of peace.

In an age without surrender ceremonies, we must earn victory through the success of our partners and the strength of our own nation. Every American who serves joins an unbroken line of heroes that stretches from Lexington to Gettysburg; from Iwo Jima to Inchon; from Khe Sanh to Kandahar — Americans who have fought to see that the lives of our children are better than our own. Our troops are the steel in our ship of state. And though our nation may be traveling through rough waters, they give us confidence that our course is true, and that beyond the pre-dawn darkness, better days lie ahead.

Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America, and all who serve her.

Recent Gallup Poll Shows GOP with an Unprecendented 10-Point Lead on Generic Ballot

August 31, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

Gallup’s weekly tracking of 2010 congressional voting preferences has recently made Gallup history when tracking midterm generic ballots for Congress, showing Republicans leading among registered voters by 51% to 41%.

Gallup candidate preferences 2010 Congressional Elections

This 10-point lead, which is based on aggregated data from registered voters surveyed August 23rd to 29th, is unprecedented in Gallup’s history, which dates back to 1942 and before this 10-point lead, the highest gap in which Republicans were leading over Democrats was five points which occurred both in July 1994 and June 2002.

2010 could very well hold another Republican wave, especially since Republican voters have also been polled as being more enthusiastic as Democrats to cast their vote. While these could be promising for Republican candidates and right-wing Americans, Gallup is reminding people not too get too set on the poll numbers, warning that Democrats moved ahead in Gallup’s generic ballot for several weeks earlier this summer, meaning some swaying in the numbers is very possible between now and Election Day. Still, this 10-point lead is making some people wonder just how far right we’ll see Congress go this year.

Mexico Supreme Court Rules in Favor of All States Recognizing Gay Marriage

August 12, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

gay marriage

In a 9-2 decision on Tuesday, Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled that all 31 states in Mexico must recognize the same-same marriages that have been and continue to be performed at the capital. An article of Mexico’s constitution requires all states to recognize legal contracts that have been drawn up elsewhere, so for marriage contracts to not be recognized throughout Mexico would be unconstitutional.

This is most definitely a victory of sorts for the GLBT community, friends, family and allies in Mexico and while the marriages of people who love each other in the country will be recognized, the ruling does not state what degree of recognition must be granted to the married couples. This could potentially pose a problem for people living in a state in Mexico that is not GLBT-friendly and who could recognize their marriage, but look for ways to not extend rights given to them by their marriage.

Same-sex couples were granted the right to marry in Mexico in March. Currently, the rights extended to these married couples are the right to adopt children, to jointly apply for bank loans, to inherit wealth and to be covered by their spouses’ insurance policies.

One of the most detrimental of those rights that could come under fire in some states of Mexico is the right for same-sex couples to adopt children. Justice Sergio Aguirre argued against adoptions by married same-sex couples, saying that children might suffer.

Prop 8 Gay Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional

August 5, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

Prop 8 gay pride In Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker‘s 136-page opinion on Proposition 8, the ban on gay marriage in California, he stated that “Proposition 8 singles out gays and lesbians and legitimates their unequal treatment … Proposition 8 perpetuates the stereotype that gays and lesbians are incapable of forming long-term loving relationships and that gays and lesbians are not good parents.”

Since the Prop 8 constitutional amendment took effect, those within the GLBT community, as well as their allies, friends and families have been spreading the message that a state’s court system should protect the people’s Constitutional rights and finally, Judge Vaughn Walker heard them loud and clear yesterday when he ruled that Prop 8 was unconstitutional, finding that it violates the Constitution’s due process and equal protection clauses while failing “to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.”

Judge Walker heard 13 days of testimony and arguments dating as far back as January during the first trial in federal court to examine if states can place a ban on gay marriage and prohibit same sex partners from marrying. This ruling is a victory for California and can potentially truly extend the same right and privilege of marriage that is currently being enjoyed by heterosexual couples, to all couples, regardless of their sexual orientation. Judge Walker’s ruling puts him at the forefront of the gay marriage debate and is only the latest high-profile legal decision accredited to the longtime Republican judge.

When the announcement that Prop 8 had been ruled unconstitutional, many celebrities, like Ellen DeGeneres, Kathy Griffin and Milla Jovovich, took to their Twitter accounts to announce their excitement about the ruling.

Ellen DeGeneres Prop 8 tweet

Kathy Griffin Prop 8 tweet

Milla Jovovich Prop 8 tweet

For more celebrities tweets about Prop 8, check out Women’s Eye on Media.

Fox News Given Front Row Seat in White House Press Briefing Room

August 3, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

Robert Gibbs

So, remember the other day when I wrote about Fox News and NPR both actively vying for the front row center seat in the White House press briefing room? Well, the announcement of who would get that very important, best seat in the room took place yesterday.

Much to the surprise of practically anyone familiar with both Fox News and NPR, Fox News was given the seat recently vacated by veteran journalist Helen Thomas. The decision, made by the White House Correspondents Association, was unanimous, and Fox News will now join popular broadcast networks and CNN up front. The WHCA stated that its decision to move Fox News to the front seat was due to their length of service and commitment to the White House television pool.

Fox News moving to the front of the room will make room for The Financial Times, who previously did not have a regular seat, along with the foreign press pool, but U.S. News & World Report lost its seat in the process. Politico and American Urban Radio Networks moved up to the third row in the briefing room, and The Washington Times will be moved to the fourth row.

Barack Obama Appears on The View

July 30, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

Barack Obama The View Barack Obama was recently a guest on The View. No, you’re not going crazy–it’s still 2010 and there is no presidential election going on.

It was announced earlier this week that President Obama would appear on The View and in no time at all, pundits were throwing their notes together, writing their speeches and coming up with silly metaphors to accurately portray how crazy they think it is for Barack Obama to be the first sitting U.S. president to ever appear on a morning talk show. A segment on Nightline concluded with a voice-over booming on over a picture of Obama with his wife and two daughters saying “After all, being constantly surrounded by women is well within Mr. Obama’s comfort zone.” Dylan Rattigan of MSNBC showed a picture of the five co-hosts of The View, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Sherri Shepherd, Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Barbara Walters, and asked “Which of these lovely ladies–each of them lovelier than the next–will actually ask the president a difficult or challenging question?” Of course Dylan Rattigan is forgetting that during the 2008 presidential election, the ladies of The View were the only form of media to outright accuse John McCain of lying during his campaign and asked him very difficult questions. In fact, New York Times columnist Frank Rich called that interview “the hardest-hitting interrogation McCain has yet faced on television.”

So what did Barack Obama speak with the five co-hosts of The View about? Well, Barbara Walters asked what the high points and low points as of late, where President Obama spoke a bit about his recent vacation to Maine and also about the economy, as it was when he was voted into office and how it is now, the progressions we have seen as far as the economy and job creation and sustainability. The president was also asked about why his presidency thus far is seen as a failure, despite his list of accomplishments–and there have been quite a few. Joy Behar asked bluntly where the “attack dog” of the left is when “The right wing, through Fox News … seem to be hijacking the narrative.”

For an even more detailed recap of the president’s interview on The View, check out Broadsheet and you can also watch two short clips of the show. The first clip is a fun one, talking about pop culture, what the president has on his iPod, if he has an iPhone (he doesn’t) and if he knew Lindsay Lohan was in jail (he did.) He however did not know who Snooki was and I have to admit, I kind of respect the man a little more for that.

NPR and Fox News Both Actively Vying for Front Row Seat in the White House Press Briefing Room

July 29, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

Fox or NPR The front row center seat in the White House press briefing room has been recently vacated by Helen Thomas. There are several news organizations who would be honored to be sitting in that seat, but those most actively vying for the seat are NPR and Fox News.

NPR is a public radio network that regularly reaches 27 million listeners with its news programming. They report on the facts in an unbiased manner, making it one of the few news sources you can frequent without having someone’s agenda pushed on you. Fox News on the other hand, is a conservative, right-wing network that features and discusses recent news from a conservative, right-wing perspective only. To give the front row center seat of the White House press briefing room to a biased news source, whose own anchors have come out saying that they are in the business of entertainment and ratings rather than reporting on real news, seems like a waste of the best seat in the White House to me.

There is a petition circulating accumulating signatures from those who feel strongly about the front row seat of the White House press briefing room going to NPR, who has had a full time White House correspondent since the 1970s. The petition reads:

“FOX News is a right-wing propaganda operation, not a legitimate news organization. Award the seat vacated by Helen Thomas to NPR, which has provided public interest coverage of the presidency and the White House for almost four decades.”

The Board of the White House Correspondents Association will make the final decision on who will be sitting in the seat during an upcoming board meeting on Monday, August 2nd. To make sure your voice is heard, sign the petition before then.

French Parliament Approves Burqa Ban

July 15, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

burqa

The French Parliament recently approved banning the burqa, a loose dress and veil that is worn by some Muslim women.

According to Wikipedia, the burqa is an enveloping outer garment worn by women in some Islamic traditions for the purpose of hiding a female’s body when out in public. It is worn over the usual daily clothing (often a long dress) and removed when the woman returns to the sanctuary of the household, out of the view of men that are not their husbands, fathers, brothers, uncles, sons and grandsons.

The burqa ban was supposed in a landslide vote of 336 to 1 and also holds the support of around 80% of French citizens. Justice Minister Michele Alliot-Marie stated after the votes were in that the ban is a “victory for humanitarian values that are the foundations of the greatness of France.”

Amnesty International’s expert on discrimination in Europe feels a great deal differently than the lower house of Parliament on the burqa ban, saying “A complete ban on the covering of the face would violate the rights to freedom of expression and religion of those women who wear the burqa or the niqab in public as an expression of their identity or beliefs.”

From here, the ban will need to be approved by the full Parliament, but it is still likely to face challenges. The French Council of State has already advised that “no incontestable legal basis can be found for an outright and generalized ban on the wearing of the full veil.” If the ban is passed by the full Parliament, it will result in making those wearing the burqa pay a fine of approximately $200. If a man is found forcing a woman to wear a burqa against her will, that man will also face some steep consequences, including a $40,000 fine and a year in jail.

Laura Bush Officially Supports Gay Marriage and Abortion Rights

May 13, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

While on Larry King Live to promote her new book, Spoken from the Heart, former First Lady Laura Bush discusses her not-so-public stance on gay marriage and abortion.

While talking to Larry King, she mentions that she was asked about her stance on both issues numerous times while serving as First Lady during both elections. I don’t know how she answered the people who asked her these questions however, because thinking about any time she really spoke to the media, I can only recall canned responses that served more as non-answers than anything else. I could be mistaken, but I really don’t think I am, especially considering what some of the organizations who heard about her appearance on Larry King Live had to say.

Michael Cole, the spokesperson for the gay rights and equality group the Human Rights Campaign responded, saying:

“When the right wing was using same-sex couples as election year pawns and the president calling for a cynical constitutional amendment to deny people rights, we would have welcomed support from the first lady. Nevertheless, her speaking out for marriage equality shows that more and more Americans realize all families need the same rights and protections.”

Right-wing conservative groups also had something to say about Laura Bush’s statement. Carrie Gordon Earll, the spokesperson for the Christian conservative group Focus on the Family issued a statement, saying:

“It’s disappointing to hear Laura Bush, who is a well respected and admired former first lady, espouse positions on marriage and the value of human life that are contrary not only to her husband’s but arguably, according to polls, in conflict with the majority of Americans.”

While I would have personally loved to see Laura Bush make her views on these very important social issues during the presidency of her husband, I do understand why she chose not to and has waited until now to write (another) book and include these messages within it. Given the statement issued by Focus on the Family, she would have been scrutinized quite a bit if she did make her stance more publicly known, as would her husband. I do give her some major props, however, for going against the party her husband is such a proud member of to make her own, personal views more well-known and to give her support to those who have been fighting for equality and choice.

Show Congress You’re Serious About Clean Energy and a Sustainable Future

April 22, 2010 by Holly
Filed Under: Politics, World

climate legislation 40 years ago, twenty million Americans flooded the streets and demanded that leaders and Washington open their eyes to stress on our planet and demanded environmental accountability from them. Because of them, great progress has been made since that time, but we are still facing new challenges posed by climate change and our addiction on fossil fuels.

We find ourselves in a position to fundamentally change the way we innovate, produce and consume and we need the government to take that same foot-forward approach that they did when the green movement had just surged through the millions who felt passionate enough to make sure the government couldn’t say no.

On this 40th anniversary of Earth Day, Care2 and over 21,000 petitioners are calling upon leaders in Washington again to demand accountability from Congress. This Sunday, Americans will gather on the National Mall in Washington, DC for the Climate Rally and all the petition signatures will be displayed, showing the power behind our call for fair, ambitious and comprehensive climate legislation.

Join the 21,000 who have already signed the petition and sign your name to show Congress that we are all serious about clean energy and a sustainable future.

Next Page »